球探体育比分_篮球比分直播-投注官网

图片
注册
闽南网 > 教育 > 招生考试 > 考研 > 考研题库 > 正文

2017考研英语二真题及参考答案(考点解析)

来源:跨考考研 2016-12-26 09:23 /

  Part A

  Directions:

  Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

  Text 4

  In a rare unanimous ruling, the US Supreme Court has overturned the corruption conviction of a former Virginia governor, Robert McDonnell. But it did so while holding its nose at the ethics of his conduct, which included accepting gifts such as a Rolex watch and a Ferrari automobile from a company seeking access to government.

  The high court’s decision said the judge in Mr. McDonnell’s trial failed to tell a jury that it must look only at his “official acts,” or the former governor’s decisions on “specific” and “unsettled” issues related to his duties.

  Merely helping a gift-giver gain access to other officials, unless done with clear intent to pressure those officials, is not corruption, the justices found.

  The court did suggest that accepting favors in return for opening doors is “distasteful” and “nasty.” But under anti-bribery laws, proof must be made of concrete benefits, such as approval of a contract or regulation. Simply arranging a meeting, making a phone call, or hosting an event is not an “official act”.

  The court’s ruling is legally sound in defining a kind of favoritism that is not criminal. Elected leaders must be allowed to help supporters deal with bureaucratic problems without fear of prosecution for bribery.” The basic compact underlying representative government,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the court,” assumes that public officials will hear from their constituents and act on their concerns.”

  But the ruling reinforces the need for citizens and their elected representatives, not the courts, to ensure equality of access to government. Officials must not be allowed to play favorites in providing information or in arranging meetings simply because an individual or group provides a campaign donation or a personal gift. This type of integrity requires well-enforced laws in government transparency, such as records of official meetings, rules on lobbying, and information about each elected leader’s source of wealth.

  Favoritism in official access can fan public perceptions of corruption. But it is not always corruption. Rather officials must avoid double standards, or different types of access for average people and the wealthy. If connections can be bought, a basic premise of democratic society—that all are equal in treatment by government—is undermined. Good governance rests on an understanding of the inherent worth of each individual.

  The court’s ruling is a step forward in the struggle against both corruption and official favoritism.

  36. The undermined sentence (Para.1) most probably shows that the court

  [A] avoided defining the extent of McDonnell’s duties.

  [B] made no compromise in convicting McDonnell.

  [C] was contemptuous of McDonnell’s conduct.

  [D] refused to comment on McDonnell’s ethics.

  【答案】[C] was contemptuous of McDonnell’s conduct.

  37. According to Paragraph 4, an official act is deemed corruptive only if it involves

  [A] leaking secrets intentionally.

  [B] sizable gains in the form of gifts.

  [C] concrete returns for gift-givers.

  [D] breaking contracts officially.

  【答案】[C] concrete returns for gift-givers.

  38. The court’s ruling is based on the assumption that public officials are

  [A] justified in addressing the needs of their constituents.

  [B] qualified to deal independently with bureaucratic issues.

  [C] allowed to focus on the concerns of their supporters.

  [D] exempt from conviction on the charge of favoritism.

  【答案】[A] justified in addressing the needs of their constituents.

  39. Well-enforced laws in government transparency are needed to

  [A] awaken the conscience of officials.

  [B] guarantee fair play in official access.

  [C] allow for certain kinds of lobbying.

  [D] inspire hopes in average people.

  【答案】[B] guarantee fair play in official access.

  40. The author’s attitude toward the court’s ruling is

  [A] sarcastic.

  [B] tolerant.

  [C] skeptical.

  [D] supportive

  【答案】[D] supportive

相关阅读:
新闻 娱乐 福建 篮球比分直播: 漳州 厦门
猜你喜欢:
已有0条评论
热门评论:
频道推荐
  • 西安交大宣布本科扩招!
  • 德阳中考总分多少分?2025年德阳市中考中招
  • 太原今年中考报名3月7日开始 总分850分
  • 新闻推荐
    @所有人 多项民生礼包加速落地快来查收 三峡大坝变形?专家:又有人在恶意炒作 北京新一波疫情为什么没出现死亡病例? 戴口罩、一米线 疫情改变了哪些习惯? 呼伦贝尔现幻日奇观 彩虹光带环绕太阳
    视觉焦点
    石狮:秋风起,紫菜香 石狮:秋风起,紫菜香
    石狮环湾生态公园内粉黛乱子草盛放 石狮环湾生态公园内粉黛乱子草盛放
    精彩视频
    医解百科︱生气,谨防甲状腺结节找上你!(视频)
    医解百科︱生气,谨防甲状腺结节找上你!(视频)
    春有约 花不误 篮球比分直播:开元寺樱花盛开
    春有约 花不误 篮球比分直播:开元寺樱花盛开
    专题推荐
    关注泉城养老服务 打造幸福老年生活
    关注泉城养老服务 打造幸福老年生活

    闽南网推出专题报道,以图、文、视频等形式,展现篮球比分直播:在补齐养老事业短板,提升养老服

    新征程,再出发——聚焦2021年全国两会
    2020福建高考招录
     
    48小时点击排行榜
    看见惠安|惠安迹忆 看见惠安|惠安迹忆 “三八”国际劳动妇女节 3月19日油价调整最新消息:下一轮油价是 中国印染行业协会福建办事处在石狮举行揭 细则出台!事关鲤城这类住房 以下哪种投资更适合作为家庭资产配置中的 成语“买椟还珠”通常用来比喻?今日蚂蚁